Member Login
Username
Password
Login
Contact Us
Register
Lost Password?
Log In
Welcome To BeliefCorner, the web's newest home for Religious Debate, Political Discussions, Spiritual Faith Forums and Web Discussion Boards
Search
Home
Forum
Links
T.O.C
Mission
Site Map
Home
Help
Search
Members
Login
Register
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email?
December 03, 2008, 01:51:38 AM
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Belief Corner
>
Political Debate
>
News
(Moderator:
allthegoodnamesweretaken
) > Topic:
A New Alliance
Pages: [
1
]
« previous
next »
Add bookmark
|
Print
Author
Topic: A New Alliance (Read 155 times)
TENAC
Full Member
Faith: church of Christ
Posts: 228
A New Alliance
«
on:
June 15, 2008, 07:53:17 PM »
Conservatives need to start a new affiliation or alliance. There should be basic core principles the guides them and should be organized state to state to endorse conservative candidates regardless of party affiliation.
This alliance needs to speak for Conservative America. It doesnt find a home in either or any political party, only in the individual candidates.
Logged
I AM...your bridge over troubled waters
~God
SquirleyWurley
Veteran
Faith: atheist
Posts: 669
Another drop in the ocean...
Re: A New Alliance
«
Reply #1 on:
June 25, 2008, 01:30:56 PM »
According to which conservative principles, and with what priorities? Sometimes social conservatives want big government to step in and defy individual state decisions or don't care about individual rights but want to do social engineering.
I suggest that fiscal responsibility, preference for gradual change rather than radical change, and a priority of shifting programs so they are more flexible so that for example, career training/rehab is emphasized with temporary and flexible benefits for a 'safety net' rather than inflexible entitlement programs, and also aiming at fighting corporate and political corruption.
I think the 'social conservatives' and the adventurists have compromised such principles.
Logged
VLinvictus
Guest
Re: A New Alliance
«
Reply #2 on:
June 25, 2008, 02:18:35 PM »
I am also interested in what those "core principles" would be.
I'm all for breaking the two-party hegemony. It would be nice to have a wider variety to choose from.
Perhaps if both conservatives and liberals could agree on a single code of core principles that expresses their ideologies and goals, we'd all be better off.
As it is, there really isn't anything to distinguish conservatives from liberals or vice versa.
Logged
Hatman
Jr. Member
Faith: Disciple of Christ
Posts: 87
Re: A New Alliance
«
Reply #3 on:
July 06, 2008, 07:29:07 AM »
TENAC-
I agree; the current Republican party is basically a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Corporatocracy. I like the conservative core principles that Ron Paul outlined during one of the debates as traditionally belonging to Republicans: small government, withdrawal from foreign wars/entanglements, maintaining and expanding infrastructure/manufacturing AT HOME, etc.
I am most interested in hearing what you think these core principles should be, though.
Warmest regards-
Hatman
Logged
“The ideal tyranny is that which is ignorantly self-administered by its victims. The most perfect slaves are, therefore, those which blissfully and unawaredly enslave themselves.”
~Dresden James
Atropos
New Member
Posts: 30
Re: A New Alliance
«
Reply #4 on:
July 06, 2008, 07:45:09 AM »
Quote from: Hatman on July 06, 2008, 07:29:07 AM
TENAC-
I agree; the current Republican party is basically a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Corporatocracy. I like the conservative core principles that Ron Paul outlined during one of the debates as traditionally belonging to Republicans: small government, withdrawal from foreign wars/entanglements, maintaining and expanding infrastructure/manufacturing AT HOME, etc.
There is already a party and political ideology that supports those ideals: it's called Libertarianism.
Logged
TENAC
Full Member
Faith: church of Christ
Posts: 228
Re: A New Alliance
«
Reply #5 on:
July 06, 2008, 12:33:25 PM »
Quote from: Hatman on July 06, 2008, 07:29:07 AM
TENAC-
I agree; the current Republican party is basically a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Corporatocracy. I like the conservative core principles that Ron Paul outlined during one of the debates as traditionally belonging to Republicans: small government, withdrawal from foreign wars/entanglements, maintaining and expanding infrastructure/manufacturing AT HOME, etc.
I am most interested in hearing what you think these core principles should be, though.
Warmest regards-
Hatman
Greetings Hat,
Its great to see a post from you.
I followed Ron Paul for a bit. He was, without question, running on the best conservative platform of any candidate. I struggled with his wanting an immediate withdrawal from the current war on terrorism, while I support becoming less a factor on the national stage with regard to foreign entanglements. We should not be the worlds police force.
I would regard NAFTA a foreign entanglement that we need to renegotiate to the point of collapse.
The US needs to stop worrying about everyone else's economies and human rights records. If we find China's human rights records abysmal, we should shut our markets to them.
There are internal entanglements we should attempt to discharge from federal control. Social Sec is unsustainable, it needs to get to a point of transfer over to private citizens as part of some weaning process.
A basic education plan should be debated and authorized from the federal govt but implemented and administred at the state level. This sounds like what we have now, but isnt.
Federal mandates should be reaffirmed unconstitutional immediately.
States need to regain their identities, keeping more of their tax dollars within their individual states, not sending them to DC (i.e. shrinking the size of the federal govt).
We have to protect our borders to the point of posting our military at our southern border. Corporations should be heavily, heavily fined for employing illegals, to the point of losing their ability to conduct business in the US.
Thats off the top of my head.
I am curious, what do you define as corporatocracy? And what would you replace it with?
Logged
I AM...your bridge over troubled waters
~God
Hatman
Jr. Member
Faith: Disciple of Christ
Posts: 87
Re: A New Alliance
«
Reply #6 on:
July 06, 2008, 09:02:30 PM »
TENAC-
First, I agree with all your points, and would support them.
Second:
Quote
I am curious, what do you define as corporatocracy?
Government of the corporations, by the corporations, and for the corporations.
Quote
And what would you replace it with?
What is a Constitutional government, ironically, that which the South fought for and Lincoln basely incorporated into his most famous speech, which turned out to be a lie: government of the people, by the people, and for the people.
BTW, that saying? From the overleaf of the original Tyndale translation-into-the-vernacular Bible, IIRC; Lincoln did not originate it.
I have lots of support for how the USG was first infiltrated, then became a corporation, then became a bankrupt corporation in receivership, too---as you are probably well-aware, if you have perused the multitudinous quotes I sent you. The USG stopped being a servant to the People long ago, and instead has become a helpless tool in the hands of international banksters who care nothing for either America OR Liberty. Here's one quote I'd like to bring to your remembrance now:
"The death of Lincoln was a disaster for Christendom. There was no man in the United States great enough to wear his boots, and the bankers went anew to grab the riches. I fear that foreign bankers with their craftiness and tortuous tricks will entirely control the exuberant riches of America and use it to systematically corrupt modern civilization."
~Otto von Bismarck, German Chancellor (1815-1898), after the Lincoln assassination.
And, of course, their depredations and schemes long pre-date Bismarck's reign:
"History records that the moneychangers have used every form of abuse, deceit, intrigue, and violent means necessary to obtain control over governments by controlling the issuance of their money." James Madison, "Father of the Constitution."
It is my carefully examined position that anyone who trusts the USG is either simply ignorant or actively worse than a fool.
With goodwill to all the People-
Hatman
Logged
“The ideal tyranny is that which is ignorantly self-administered by its victims. The most perfect slaves are, therefore, those which blissfully and unawaredly enslave themselves.”
~Dresden James
TENAC
Full Member
Faith: church of Christ
Posts: 228
Re: A New Alliance
«
Reply #7 on:
July 07, 2008, 10:50:33 AM »
Quote from: Hatman on July 06, 2008, 09:02:30 PM
TENAC-
First, I agree with all your points, and would support them.
Second:
Quote
I am curious, what do you define as corporatocracy?
Government of the corporations, by the corporations, and for the corporations.
Quote
And what would you replace it with?
What is a Constitutional government, ironically, that which the South fought for and Lincoln basely incorporated into his most famous speech, which turned out to be a lie: government of the people, by the people, and for the people.
BTW, that saying? From the overleaf of the original Tyndale translation-into-the-vernacular Bible, IIRC; Lincoln did not originate it.
I have lots of support for how the USG was first infiltrated, then became a corporation, then became a bankrupt corporation in receivership, too---as you are probably well-aware, if you have perused the multitudinous quotes I sent you. The USG stopped being a servant to the People long ago, and instead has become a helpless tool in the hands of international banksters who care nothing for either America OR Liberty. Here's one quote I'd like to bring to your remembrance now:
"The death of Lincoln was a disaster for Christendom. There was no man in the United States great enough to wear his boots, and the bankers went anew to grab the riches. I fear that foreign bankers with their craftiness and tortuous tricks will entirely control the exuberant riches of America and use it to systematically corrupt modern civilization."
~Otto von Bismarck, German Chancellor (1815-1898), after the Lincoln assassination.
And, of course, their depredations and schemes long pre-date Bismarck's reign:
"History records that the moneychangers have used every form of abuse, deceit, intrigue, and violent means necessary to obtain control over governments by controlling the issuance of their money." James Madison, "Father of the Constitution."
It is my carefully examined position that anyone who trusts the USG is either simply ignorant or actively worse than a fool.
With goodwill to all the People-
Hatman
To a large degree, perhaps overwhelming, I am with you on the definition of corporatocracy.
I have the quotes you have sent me on my old laptop. If I can get it fired up, I need to move it to my new one and save them there.
But I did read every one.
The amount of money it takes to fund the federal govt is beyond alarming and has been for some time. This is what politics is really all about. Once we got beyond the first generation of social security, the cat was out of the bag. It appeared our government had its own money, while not remembering it was ours to begin with. That is frightening in and of itself.
This is part of the succeeding generations after the FF's not taking the long view. We all view our 70 years (short view) while they in turn thought of the infinity of a perpetual democratic republic. And put all they owned on the line for it when they signed the Declaration for it.
At that point, we are failing them.
The succeeding generations werent used to pain and didnt deal with it very well. I dont think it is getting any better. We push the debt of this nation off until later generations while we could fix that part relatively fast. But we cant do it in a global economy where we are expected to bear the brunt of everything and everyones problems and situations.
The physician/surgeon that makes $750,000 to $1,500, 000 annually, is he really overpaid? Maybe so. How much pain will that vital industry take to correct it? Nurses can make $50,000 to $75,000 anually, radiologist $100,000 +. How do you wind down an economy like that?
Congress making in excess of $180,000 per year, are we getting our money's worth?
No. Again NO!
But we are surely getting what we pay for.
Congress is a cesspool. Anyone thinking a straight answer is coming from there is a fool to be sure.
How can one tell a crooked stick? He must first realize the straight one and we have all but forgotten what the straight stick looks like.
Hat, when you determine to run for office, let me know where to send the donation.
Logged
I AM...your bridge over troubled waters
~God
TENAC
Full Member
Faith: church of Christ
Posts: 228
Re: A New Alliance
«
Reply #8 on:
July 07, 2008, 11:35:59 AM »
Hatman,
Have you read the book Jesus for President?
Logged
I AM...your bridge over troubled waters
~God
Hatman
Jr. Member
Faith: Disciple of Christ
Posts: 87
Re: A New Alliance
«
Reply #9 on:
July 07, 2008, 07:30:15 PM »
TENAC-
First, curiously enough, I DID read "Jesus for President," cover to cover, back in March. I agree with most of what the authors have to say, however, I take it a bit further than they do.
The Kingdom is here and now by faith, and it is at enmity with the governments "of the world"; always has been, always will be, until every thought is taken captive to serve Christ in each other, something that is quite anathema to the current pretended powers of Mammon.
And ROFL about voting for me! Actually, in order to vote, one must first disobey Christ by swearing under penalty of perjury that they are citizens of the United States, which is actually the UNITED STATES, Inc., a bankrupt corporation in receivership to the "holders in due course of the bankruptcy." If I go under their authority and dominion, I will have abandoned the Kingdom and it's King, and also become surety for their debts, which, BY LAW(or rather, "public policy," which has
superseded
positive law in most instances) can NEVER be repaid. Why, you ask? Here's a recent quote I think missing from your collection which explains:
"The whole profit of the issuance of money has provided the capital of the great banking business as it exists today. Starting with nothing whatever of their own, they have got the whole world into their debt irredeemably, by a trick. This money comes into existence every time the banks 'lend' and disappears every time the debt is repaid to them. So that if industry tries to repay, the money of the nation disappears. This is what makes prosperity so 'dangerous' as it destroys money just when it is most needed and precipitates a slump. There is nothing left now for us but to get ever deeper and deeper into debt to the banking system in order to provide the increasing amounts of money the nation requires for its expansion and growth. An honest money system is the only alternative."
-- Frederick Soddy(1877-1956) British author, professor, Nobel Prize for Chemistry, 1921
and here's another, like unto it:
"The present Federal Reserve System is a flagrant case of the Government’s conferring a special privilege upon bankers. The Government hands to the banks its credit, at virtually no cost to the banks, to be loaned out by the bankers for their own private profit. Still worse, however, is the fact that it gives the bankers practically complete control of the amount of money that shall be in circulation. Not one dollar of these Federal Reserve notes gets into circulation and without someone paying interest to some bank to keep it circulation. Our present money system is a debt of money system. Before a dollar can circulate, a debt must be created. Such a system assumes that you can borrow yourself out of debt."
― Willis A. Overholser, LL.B - in History of Money in the United States.
And here are a few more, which may enlighten your discretion:
"Whoever controls the volume of money in a country is absolute master of all it's industry and commerce." ~James Garfield, assassinated not long after his inaugural speech, which also included the following quote:
"The chief duty of the National Government in connection with the currency of the country is to coin money and declare its value. Grave doubts have been entertained whether Congress is authorized by the Constitution to make any form of paper money legal tender. The present issue of United States notes has been sustained by the necessities of war; but such paper should depend for its value and currency upon its convenience in use and its prompt redemption in coin at the will of the holder, and not upon its compulsory circulation.
These notes are not money, but promises to pay money
. If the holders demand it, the promise should be kept."
-- James A. Garfield(1831-1881) 20th President of the United States (1881)
Source: Inaugural Address, March 14, 1891
"I believe that if the people of this nation fully understood what Congress has done to them over the last 49 years, they would move on Washington; they would not wait for an election... It adds up to a preconceived plan to destroy the economic and social independence of the United States!"
-- George W. Malone(1890-1961) U.S. Senator (Nevada)1957
Source: speaking before Congress
"...You own no Property because you are a slave. Really you are worse off than a slave because you are also a debtor... Don't let this information alarm you because without it you cannot be free. You have to understand that all slavery and freedom originates in the mind. When your mind allows you to accept and understand that the United States, Great Britain and the Vatican are corporations which are nothing but fictional entities which have been placed into your mind, you will understand that our slavery is because we believe in fictions." - Stephen Ames.
And take a gander at the following quote, which lays out how evil these PTB are in their methodology and the scope of their planning:
“Slavery is likely to be abolished by the war power and all chattel slavery abolished. This I and my European friends are in favor of, for
slavery is but the owning of labor and
carries with it the care of the laborers,
while the European plan, led on by England, is that capital shall control labor by controlling wages
. The great debt that the capitalists will see to it is made out of the war, must be used as a means to control the volume of money. To accomplish this the bonds must be used as a banking basis. We are now waiting for the Secretary of the Treasury to make this recommendation to Congress. It will not do to allow the greenback, as it is called, to circulate as money any length of time, as we can not control that. But we can control the bonds and through them the bank issues.”
~London bankers, Hazard circular, July 1862.
“We have stricken the shackles from four million human beings and brought all laborers to a common level, not so much by the elevation of the former slaves as by practically reducing the whole working population, white and black, to a condition of serfdom. While boasting of our noble deeds, we are careful to conceal the ugly fact that by our iniquitous money system we have nationalized a system of oppression which, though more refined, is not less cruel than the old system of chattel slavery.”
~Horace Greely(“Go West, Young Man!"), 1872
Now, moving on to the Corporations...
As the father of the Constitution, President James Madison, wrote, "There is an evil which
ought to be guarded against in the indefinite accumulation of property from the capacity
of holding it in perpetuity by... corporations. The power of all corporations ought to be
limited in this respect. The growing wealth acquired by them never fails to be a source of
abuses." It's one of the reasons why the word "corporation" doesn't exist in the
constitution - they were to be chartered only by states, so local people could keep a close
eye on them.
-----
President Andrew Jackson, in a speech to Congress, said, "In this point of the case the
question is distinctly presented whether the people of the United States are to govern
through representatives chosen by their unbiased suffrages [votes] or whether the money
and power of a great corporation are to be secretly exerted to influence their judgment
and control their decisions."
-----
And the president who followed him, Martin Van Buren, added in his annual address to
Congress: "I am more than ever convinced of the dangers to which the free and unbiased
exercise of political opinion - the only sure foundation and safeguard of republican
government - would be exposed by any further increase of the already overgrown
influence of corporate authorities."
----
Even Abraham Lincoln weighed in, writing, "We may congratulate ourselves that this
cruel war is nearing its end. It has cost a vast amount of treasure and blood. The best
blood of the flower of American youth has been freely offered upon our country's altar
that the nation might live. It has indeed been a trying hour for the Republic; but I see in
the near future a crisis approaching that unnerves me and causes me to tremble for the
safety of my country.
"As a result of the war," Lincoln continued, "corporations have been enthroned and an
era of corruption in high places will follow, and the money power of the country will
endeavor to prolong its reign by working upon the prejudices of the people until all wealth
is aggregated in a few hands and the Republic is destroyed. I feel at this moment more
anxiety than ever before, even in the midst of war. God grant that my suspicions may
prove groundless." Lincoln held the largest corporations - the railroads - at bay until his
assassination.
But then came the railroad barons, vastly enriched by the Civil War.
----
Thom Hartmann is the author of "Unequal Protection: The Rise of Corporate Dominance
and the Theft of Human Rights"
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
So, as should be readily discernible from the foregoing, the true barriers to restoring the American Republic are the Banksters in alliance with Corporations; those who have taken enemies like these on directly have died rather swiftly, and/or been swiftly marginalized/criminalized/institutionalized.
Although I have been free from the influences of either drugs or alcohol for more than 14 years, that plus my mental health history(involuntarily hospitalized for manic depression---nowadays re-named "bi-polar disorder" to make it sound more palatable and PC---for over 1.5 years from Jun '87-Dec '88) would, I assure you, make running for office a laughable proposition for me. However, I will vote for YOU!---well, as long as "swearing" that I am of a jurisdiction other than that of Christ is not a prerequisite...
*grin*
But now you know the true enemies of Liberty, and have further evidence as to who lifts the "unseen hand" behind USG decisions.
Warmest regards-
Hatman
P.S. Ok, one more pithy quote to add to your collection and your storehouse of wisdom, a tidbit not taught, afaik, in ANY school in America that accepts any public or private donations from Foundations(yet another tool in the hands of the Collectivists, for the winners of wars not only get to write history, but dictate curriculae):
“The refusal of King George III to allow the colonies operate an honest money system, which freed the ordinary man from the clutches of the money-manipulators, was probably the prime cause of the Revolution.”
~Benjamin Franklin
Logged
“The ideal tyranny is that which is ignorantly self-administered by its victims. The most perfect slaves are, therefore, those which blissfully and unawaredly enslave themselves.”
~Dresden James
SquirleyWurley
Veteran
Faith: atheist
Posts: 669
Another drop in the ocean...
Re: A New Alliance
«
Reply #10 on:
July 07, 2008, 07:57:39 PM »
As I've said before, I don't know enough about the economics, the history, etc., to evaluate what you are saying, and my view is that such speculative opinions are just that: speculative opinions.
As far as religion is concerned, I don't think Jesus was dealing with economics/history/politics in that way and to that degree, and at any rate the main message of Jesus was on other issues: challenging your own personal character, opening up to spiritual grace, faith.
I just don't think prophecies and apocalypses were about economic/political history.
I think prophecies and apocalypses (in general) were about encouraging people to have faith and know that there was merit in being just and faithful, despite appearances to the contrary in their immediate history, with hope for the future, with scouring condemnation of the unjust/tyrannical/abusive powers that be in this world.
Logged
TENAC
Full Member
Faith: church of Christ
Posts: 228
Re: A New Alliance
«
Reply #11 on:
July 07, 2008, 08:39:02 PM »
Quote from: Hatman on July 07, 2008, 07:30:15 PM
TENAC-
First, curiously enough, I DID read "Jesus for President," cover to cover, back in March. I agree with most of what the authors have to say, however, I take it a bit further than they do.
The Kingdom is here and now by faith, and it is at enmity with the governments "of the world"; always has been, always will be, until every thought is taken captive to serve Christ in each other, something that is quite anathema to the current pretended powers of Mammon.
And ROFL about voting for me! Actually, in order to vote, one must first disobey Christ by swearing under penalty of perjury that they are citizens of the United States, which is actually the UNITED STATES, Inc., a bankrupt corporation in receivership to the "holders in due course of the bankruptcy." If I go under their authority and dominion, I will have abandoned the Kingdom and it's King, and also become surety for their debts, which, BY LAW(or rather, "public policy," which has
superseded
positive law in most instances) can NEVER be repaid. Why, you ask? Here's a recent quote I think missing from your collection which explains:
"The whole profit of the issuance of money has provided the capital of the great banking business as it exists today. Starting with nothing whatever of their own, they have got the whole world into their debt irredeemably, by a trick. This money comes into existence every time the banks 'lend' and disappears every time the debt is repaid to them. So that if industry tries to repay, the money of the nation disappears. This is what makes prosperity so 'dangerous' as it destroys money just when it is most needed and precipitates a slump. There is nothing left now for us but to get ever deeper and deeper into debt to the banking system in order to provide the increasing amounts of money the nation requires for its expansion and growth. An honest money system is the only alternative."
-- Frederick Soddy(1877-1956) British author, professor, Nobel Prize for Chemistry, 1921
and here's another, like unto it:
"The present Federal Reserve System is a flagrant case of the Government’s conferring a special privilege upon bankers. The Government hands to the banks its credit, at virtually no cost to the banks, to be loaned out by the bankers for their own private profit. Still worse, however, is the fact that it gives the bankers practically complete control of the amount of money that shall be in circulation. Not one dollar of these Federal Reserve notes gets into circulation and without someone paying interest to some bank to keep it circulation. Our present money system is a debt of money system. Before a dollar can circulate, a debt must be created. Such a system assumes that you can borrow yourself out of debt."
― Willis A. Overholser, LL.B - in History of Money in the United States.
And here are a few more, which may enlighten your discretion:
"Whoever controls the volume of money in a country is absolute master of all it's industry and commerce." ~James Garfield, assassinated not long after his inaugural speech, which also included the following quote:
"The chief duty of the National Government in connection with the currency of the country is to coin money and declare its value. Grave doubts have been entertained whether Congress is authorized by the Constitution to make any form of paper money legal tender. The present issue of United States notes has been sustained by the necessities of war; but such paper should depend for its value and currency upon its convenience in use and its prompt redemption in coin at the will of the holder, and not upon its compulsory circulation.
These notes are not money, but promises to pay money
. If the holders demand it, the promise should be kept."
-- James A. Garfield(1831-1881) 20th President of the United States (1881)
Source: Inaugural Address, March 14, 1891
"I believe that if the people of this nation fully understood what Congress has done to them over the last 49 years, they would move on Washington; they would not wait for an election... It adds up to a preconceived plan to destroy the economic and social independence of the United States!"
-- George W. Malone(1890-1961) U.S. Senator (Nevada)1957
Source: speaking before Congress
"...You own no Property because you are a slave. Really you are worse off than a slave because you are also a debtor... Don't let this information alarm you because without it you cannot be free. You have to understand that all slavery and freedom originates in the mind. When your mind allows you to accept and understand that the United States, Great Britain and the Vatican are corporations which are nothing but fictional entities which have been placed into your mind, you will understand that our slavery is because we believe in fictions." - Stephen Ames.
And take a gander at the following quote, which lays out how evil these PTB are in their methodology and the scope of their planning:
“Slavery is likely to be abolished by the war power and all chattel slavery abolished. This I and my European friends are in favor of, for
slavery is but the owning of labor and
carries with it the care of the laborers,
while the European plan, led on by England, is that capital shall control labor by controlling wages
. The great debt that the capitalists will see to it is made out of the war, must be used as a means to control the volume of money. To accomplish this the bonds must be used as a banking basis. We are now waiting for the Secretary of the Treasury to make this recommendation to Congress. It will not do to allow the greenback, as it is called, to circulate as money any length of time, as we can not control that. But we can control the bonds and through them the bank issues.”
~London bankers, Hazard circular, July 1862.
“We have stricken the shackles from four million human beings and brought all laborers to a common level, not so much by the elevation of the former slaves as by practically reducing the whole working population, white and black, to a condition of serfdom. While boasting of our noble deeds, we are careful to conceal the ugly fact that by our iniquitous money system we have nationalized a system of oppression which, though more refined, is not less cruel than the old system of chattel slavery.”
~Horace Greely(“Go West, Young Man!"), 1872
Now, moving on to the Corporations...
As the father of the Constitution, President James Madison, wrote, "There is an evil which
ought to be guarded against in the indefinite accumulation of property from the capacity
of holding it in perpetuity by... corporations. The power of all corporations ought to be
limited in this respect. The growing wealth acquired by them never fails to be a source of
abuses." It's one of the reasons why the word "corporation" doesn't exist in the
constitution - they were to be chartered only by states, so local people could keep a close
eye on them.
-----
President Andrew Jackson, in a speech to Congress, said, "In this point of the case the
question is distinctly presented whether the people of the United States are to govern
through representatives chosen by their unbiased suffrages [votes] or whether the money
and power of a great corporation are to be secretly exerted to influence their judgment
and control their decisions."
-----
And the president who followed him, Martin Van Buren, added in his annual address to
Congress: "I am more than ever convinced of the dangers to which the free and unbiased
exercise of political opinion - the only sure foundation and safeguard of republican
government - would be exposed by any further increase of the already overgrown
influence of corporate authorities."
----
Even Abraham Lincoln weighed in, writing, "We may congratulate ourselves that this
cruel war is nearing its end. It has cost a vast amount of treasure and blood. The best
blood of the flower of American youth has been freely offered upon our country's altar
that the nation might live. It has indeed been a trying hour for the Republic; but I see in
the near future a crisis approaching that unnerves me and causes me to tremble for the
safety of my country.
"As a result of the war," Lincoln continued, "corporations have been enthroned and an
era of corruption in high places will follow, and the money power of the country will
endeavor to prolong its reign by working upon the prejudices of the people until all wealth
is aggregated in a few hands and the Republic is destroyed. I feel at this moment more
anxiety than ever before, even in the midst of war. God grant that my suspicions may
prove groundless." Lincoln held the largest corporations - the railroads - at bay until his
assassination.
But then came the railroad barons, vastly enriched by the Civil War.
----
Thom Hartmann is the author of "Unequal Protection: The Rise of Corporate Dominance
and the Theft of Human Rights"
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
So, as should be readily discernible from the foregoing, the true barriers to restoring the American Republic are the Banksters in alliance with Corporations; those who have taken enemies like these on directly have died rather swiftly, and/or been swiftly marginalized/criminalized/institutionalized.
Although I have been free from the influences of either drugs or alcohol for more than 14 years, that plus my mental health history(involuntarily hospitalized for manic depression---nowadays re-named "bi-polar disorder" to make it sound more palatable and PC---for over 1.5 years from Jun '87-Dec '88) would, I assure you, make running for office a laughable proposition for me. However, I will vote for YOU!---well, as long as "swearing" that I am of a jurisdiction other than that of Christ is not a prerequisite...
*grin*
But now you know the true enemies of Liberty, and have further evidence as to who lifts the "unseen hand" behind USG decisions.
Warmest regards-
Hatman
P.S. Ok, one more pithy quote to add to your collection and your storehouse of wisdom, a tidbit not taught, afaik, in ANY school in America that accepts any public or private donations from Foundations(yet another tool in the hands of the Collectivists, for the winners of wars not only get to write history, but dictate curriculae):
“The refusal of King George III to allow the colonies operate an honest money system, which freed the ordinary man from the clutches of the money-manipulators, was probably the prime cause of the Revolution.”
~Benjamin Franklin
Bravo! I always liked Ben. Whatever would we have named 40% of the roads and cities in this fair country were it not for him?
Sometimes to move forward, one must move backwards first. I dont think we can, as a nation, go back as far as needed to change our current course.
Were it not for the monetary system (unconstitutional Federal Reserve) there is no telling how much wealth this country could have accumulated over the past century. The monetary policy have had a great hand in maintaining the poverty classes as well as racism.
The quotes above a interesting if not telling. As I read through them, it was easy to see which were before the
I am not as strong on corporacracy as you seem to be. The Madison quote is telling however. But then, before the corporations, what did you have except private ownership? Would that have prevented WalMart? The United States was not a wealthy country at its inception, but has certainly overachieved through 150 years. At our founding the interstate commerce that has evolved could not have been envisioned, much less global commerce in trade. So what to do but allow government intervention and regulate? And from DC?
My son actually was reading Jesus for President, and has lent it to me. I am at approximately page 200. I do have thoughts regarding it, thus far and have a good idea of where it is headed. My son (21) isnt quite old enough to see the depth within it, but he has surprised me before.
Once I began to vote, my first was for Carter, then Reagan and conservative from that point on, I considered joining the Republican party. But even then, the idea of labeling myself a "Republican" said things about me and I felt it coated me with things I did not care to be coated with. I can be a Christian first and foremost, then conservative without implication. The former tells me I should not align myself with "Republican" as that might have many and sometimes distasteful implications of which dont represent Christ, and could represent something far worst tomorrow.
My hat is off to you (no pun intended)! Fourteen years! You are gaining freedom day by day?! I will keep you in my thoughts and prayers for praise and strength. We shall make a strong cabinet post for you upon my election to maintain my head level when the corporations come to call!
My best to you and yours.
tenac
Logged
I AM...your bridge over troubled waters
~God
Hatman
Jr. Member
Faith: Disciple of Christ
Posts: 87
Re: A New Alliance
«
Reply #12 on:
July 08, 2008, 03:12:44 PM »
Quote
Bravo! I always liked Ben. Whatever would we have named 40% of the roads and cities in this fair country were it not for him?
Macadam? Gravel? But yeah, Benjamin was an interesting character, and a great man, albeit not as moral as certain "christian" groups would have preferred, I'm sure. However, I think that the Divine Light of Inspiration shone in and around him on multiple occasions, probably a cause for their jealousy. In fact, FatherOblivion(from the "board that shall not be named) has the following as his signature line: "In wine, there is wisdom; in beer, there is freedom; in water, there is bacteria." ~Benjamin Franklin, he says, but probably falsely attributed; afaik, in the 1770's, no one called 'em bacteria, yet.
Quote
Sometimes to move forward, one must move backwards first.
True, dat; iirc, the Constitutions of both Georgia and Vermont contain articles referring to "a frequent recurrence to fundamental principles," which is a VERY good thing. If you'd like, I'll attempt to find those particular quotes. Said that to say this; when lost, one cannot have a clear idea of where to go until one retraces their steps and gets their bearings---THEN, they may proceed with confidence and clarity.
Quote
I dont think we can, as a nation, go back as far as needed to change our current course.
Probably not, and here's one reason:
"Can the real Constitution be restored? Probably not. Too many Americans depend on government money under programs the Constitution doesn't authorize, and money talks with an eloquence Shakespeare could only envy. Ignorant people don't understand The Federalist Papers, but they understand government checks with their names on them."
-- Joseph Sobran(1946- ) Columnist
Quote
Were it not for the monetary system (unconstitutional Federal Reserve) there is no telling how much wealth this country could have accumulated over the past century. The monetary policy have had a great hand in maintaining the poverty classes as well as racism.
After several years of investigation and multiple books I've read, my conclusion is that approximately 90-95% of ALL the world's ills can be laid directly at the feet of those slaves to Mammon who pretend they are free because of their wealth(which allows them to enslave others), which will eat them like fire at the last day, according to James ch 5, iirc. As but two examples, cures for cancer and virtually all other diseases have been suppressed by them, as well as multiple energy-related inventions. Google 'Royal Rife' and read his story at the Rense.com article, and also google "3000 inventions suppressed", looking for the PESWiki article. So, yes, what is currently passing for "wealth" in this country is mostly valueless Federal Reserve Notes, empty PROMISES to pay dollars, but in and of themselves, naught but literal "monopoly money."
Quote
The quotes above a interesting if not telling. As I read through them, it was easy to see which were before the
Uh-oh! Something ate the rest of that sentence!(although I can speculate that the end went something like "before the Civil War"). I find it particularly interesting that there must have been quite a body of evidence regarding the plots, designs, and manipulations of the "moneyed classes" long before Madison wrote his apropos quote, which, IIRC, predates the Constitution itself!
Quote
I am not as strong on corporacracy as you seem to be.
I don't know what you mean here, although I will assume that this means "I am not as against the Corporatocracy as you are," which is ok. If you have the time or inclination, go(or buy) and read "Confessions of an Economic Hitman," or go and visit the
www.onedollardvdproject.com
, and order a few CD copies for yourself and friends you hope to awaken.
Quote
The Madison quote is telling however. But then, before the corporations, what did you have except private ownership?
The wealthy have long written the laws to favor themselves, and change them whenever the hoi polloi discover their loopholes and twists of the law; btw, did you know that the root word of "attorney" is "attorn," which means "to turn(over)" or to twist? This is why there's a subtle---but important---difference between attorney's and lawyers. But yes, a reading of "The Law," by Frederic Bastiat(see
http://www.barefootsworld.net/the_law.html
), would shortly reveal to your awakening mind that laws exist to protect life, liberty, and property, not the reverse. To perhaps whet your appetite for more, here are a few of his quotations:
"The war against illegal plunder has been fought since the beginning of the world. But how is... legal plunder to be identified? Quite simply. See if the law takes from some persons what belongs to them, and gives it to other persons to whom it does not belong. See if the law benefits one citizen at the expense of another by doing what the citizen himself cannot do without committing a crime. Then abolish this law without delay ... If such a law is not abolished immediately it will spread, multiply and develop into a system."
-- Frederic Bastiat(1801-1850) French economist, statesman, and author. He did most of his writing during the years just before -- and immediately following -- the French Revolution of February 1848
Source: "The Law" (1848)
"Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place."
-- Frederic Bastiat(1801-1850) French economist, statesman, and author.
Source: The Law, by Frederic Bastiat, 1850
"Men naturally rebel against the injustice of which they are victims. Thus, when plunder is organized by law for the profit of those who make the law, all the plundered classes try somehow to enter -- by peaceful or revolutionary means -- into the making of laws. According to their degree of enlightenment, these plundered classes may propose one of two entirely different purposes when they attempt to attain political power: Either they may wish to stop lawful plunder, or they may wish to share in it."
-- Frederic Bastiat(1801-1850) French economist, statesman, and author.
Source: "The Law" (1848)
"When law and morality contradict each other, the citizen has the cruel alternative of either losing his moral sense or losing his respect for the law."
-- Frederic Bastiat(1801-1850) French economist, statesman, and author.
"Everyone wants to live at the expense of the State; what they forget, though, is that the State lives at the expense of everyone."
-- Frederic Bastiat (1801-1850) French economist, statesman, and author.
"There is in all of us a strong disposition to believe that anything lawful is also legitimate. This belief is so widespread that many persons have erroneously held that things are 'just' because the law makes them so."
-- Frederic Bastiat (1801-1850) French economist, statesman, and author.
And to pick up on this last quote, please do your best to remember the following judicial rulings---ALWAYS:
"The jury has the right to judge both the law as well as the fact in controversy."
-- John Jay(1745-1829) first Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, First President of the United States - preceding George Washington, one of three men most responsible for the US Constitution
Source: Georgia v. Brailsford, 1794
"The jury, in all criminal cases, shall be the judges of the law and the facts."
-- Georgia Declaration of Rights, Art.I, Sec.II, Para. I
"NO one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it." 16th American Jurisprudence 2nd edition, Sec 177, late 2nd, Sec 256.
"All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void." - Marbury vs. Madison, 5 US (2 Cranch) 137, 174, 176, (1803). See also Miranda vs. Arizona, 384 US 436 p. 491 and Norton vs. Shelby County, 118 US 425 p. 442
"The pages of history shine on instances of the jury's exercise of its prerogative to disregard the instructions." - U.S. vs. Dougherty, 473 F 2d 1113, 1139 (1972), and see also State of Georgia vs. Brailford, et al 3 Dall, 1, and U.S. vs. Moynihan, 417 2d 1002, 1006 (1969)
Now, a couple more:
"Emergency does not create power. Emergency does not increase granted power or remove or diminish the restrictions imposed upon power granted or reserved. The Constitution was adopted in a period of grave emergency. Its grants of power to the federal government and its limitations of the power of the States were determined in the light of emergency, and they are not altered by emergency."
-- Justice Charles Evans Hughes, (1862-1948) Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme
Court.
Source: Home Building & Loan Assn v. Blairsdell, 1934
"Because we fear the responsibility for our actions, we have allowed ourselves to develop the mentality of slaves. Contrary to the stirring sentiments of the Declaration of Independence, we now pledge "our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor" not to one another for our mutual protection, but to the state, whose actions continue to exploit, despoil, and destroy us."
-- Butler D. Shaffer, Professor, Southwestern University School of Law, June 9, 2003
"Here is the Golden Rule of sound citizenship, the first and greatest lesson in the study of politics: You get the same order of criminality from any State to which you give power to exercise it; and whatever power you give the State to do things FOR you carries with it the equivalent power to do things TO you."
-- Albert Jay Nock, (1870-1945)
Source: The Criminality of the State, America Mercury Magazine, March, 1939
"[T]he State's criminality is nothing new and nothing to be wondered at. It began when the first predatory group of men clustered together and formed the State, and it will continue as long as the State exists in the world, because the State is fundamentally an anti-social institution, fundamentally criminal. The idea that the State originated to serve any kind of social purpose is completely unhistorical. It originated in conquest and confiscation -- that is to say, in crime. It originated for the purpose of maintaining the division of society into an owning-and-exploiting class and a property-less dependent class -- that is, for a criminal purpose. No State known to history originated in any other manner, or for any other purpose. Like all predatory or parasitic institutions, its first instinct is that of self-preservation. All its enterprises are directed first towards preserving its own life, and, second, towards increasing its own power and enlarging the scope of its own activity. For the sake of this it will, and regularly does, commit any crime which circumstances make expedient."
-- Albert Jay Nock(1870-1945)
Source: The Criminality of the State, America Mercury Magazine, March, 1939
The foregoing is a quite eloquent and concise reason to NEVER trust "the State," but to watch it like a hawk, and sound a strong alarm at every infringement and encroachment upon the sacred jewel of Liberty.
Quote
Would that have prevented WalMart?
No corporations, no corporate privileges, so probably yes.
Quote
The United States was not a wealthy country at its inception, but has certainly overachieved through 150 years.
Actually, it was QUITE wealthy until 1913, which is the point when---by hook and crook---the PTB got two pieces of legislation crucial to their long-term plans passed into law: the Federal Reserve Board Act, and the personal income tax---the latter of which started at such a small percentage that few took alarm at this experiment on our Liberty, as they should have done. The former was another plot, for there has been a battle between central banking and de-centralized banking since this nation's inception. If you show an interest, I'll will find you some good reading on the battle between Biddle(president of the Second National Bank, a central bank) and Jackson in the 1820's-30's, when president Andrew Jackson won the battle and kicked the central bankers OUT of this country; with the exception of the War For State's Rights years, this country enjoyed such great prosperity that the Treasury regularly reported embarrassingly high SURPLUSES EVERY YEAR, WITHOUT THERE BEING A PERSONAL INCOME TAX, which is why the central and foreign bankers cast their greedy eyes upon America, contriving a clever plot to steal the wealth of our grandfathers and their posterity(us).
Quote
At our founding the interstate commerce that has evolved could not have been envisioned, much less global commerce in trade. So what to do but allow government intervention and regulate? And from DC?
True, however, the principles of fair and equitable trading have long precedent, and are rather well-established, too---and paying interest to international bankers was not one of these fair and equitable and JUST provisions. Consider the following, if you will:
5. "Centralization of credit in the banks of the state, by means of a national bank with state capital and an exclusive monopoly." (this, btw, is the Fifth Plank of the Communist Manifesto; in point of fact, the Banksters have financed virtually EVERY "ism" on the planet, all with the goal of reducing populations under absolute despotism, as the following quote illustrates:
"The invisible Money Power is working to control and enslave mankind. It financed Communism, Fascism, Marxism, Zionism, Socialism. All of these are directed to making the United States a member of a World Government."
- American Mercury Magazine, December 1957, p. 92
As you will recall from St. John's Revelation, a One World Government---with the worst persecution to ever hit this old planet---comes soon, and the powers of Mammon are firmly behind both.
"There is no safety for honest men except by believing all possible evil of evil men."
-- Edmund Burke(1729-1797) Irish-born British statesman, parliamentary orator, and political thinker
The main trouble seems to be that these people are SO evil as to be unbelievable by most.
Quote
My son actually was reading Jesus for President, and has lent it to me. I am at approximately page 200. I do have thoughts regarding it, thus far and have a good idea of where it is headed. My son (21) isnt quite old enough to see the depth within it, but he has surprised me before.
Yes, the Kingdom is "spread out over all the earth, but men do not see it" according to the Gospel of Thomas and a manifold number of believers who have found it over the centuries, like Seraphim of Sarov's conversation with Nicolas Motovilov, found here(although many others have written of the same experience):
http://www.orthodoxinfo.com/praxis/wonderful.aspx
Quote
Once I began to vote, my first was for Carter, then Reagan and conservative from that point on, I considered joining the Republican party. But even then, the idea of labeling myself a "Republican" said things about me and I felt it coated me with things I did not care to be coated with. I can be a Christian first and foremost, then conservative without implication. The former tells me I should not align myself with "Republican" as that might have many and sometimes distasteful implications of which dont represent Christ, and could represent something far worst tomorrow.
What I believe has happened is that the money power got behind the majority of the supposed lawmakers in this country of BOTH parties, and the latter no longer serve the People as a whole, but those who buttered their bread. This is one of the greatest dangers to the Constitutional Republic, and as of now, it is virtually destroyed. There are extremely few members of that body whose loyalty has not been bought by these master manipulators---or blackmailed, or threatened, whatever it takes/took. As a result, most of us blindly think we are required to vote for one of two monsters, a Scylla or Charybdis. One promotes corporate profit at the expense of the people, and the other promotes government tyranny at the expense of the people---what do they each have in common?
Quote
My hat is off to you (no pun intended)! Fourteen years! You are gaining freedom day by day?! I will keep you in my thoughts and prayers for praise and strength. We shall make a strong cabinet post for you upon my election to maintain my head level when the corporations come to call!
I appreciate your kudo's for the ongoing process of becoming an "overcomer." There's still a ways to go, for me. And yes, I took James 1:25 instruction to "look into the law of perfect liberty" rather seriously, and am still in the process of being set completely free. The trouble with seeking the truth is that you find it, if you are diligent. The simple fact is that the noble experiment of our forefathers has been betrayed, and will not be restored until enough people re-awaken to not only what liberty IS, but what methods and tricks have been used to STEAL it from us...even Henry Ford, by most accounts reported to be not the brightest bulb in the box, discovered and related the following:
“The people must be helped to think naturally about money. They must be told what it is, and what makes it money, and what are the possible TRICKS OF THE PRESENT SYSTEM which put nations and peoples UNDER CONTROL OF THE FEW. If the American people knew the CORRUPTION IN OUR MONEY SYSTEM THERE WOULD BE REVOLUTION BEFORE MORNING!”― Henry Ford, Sr. — American Developer of the Automobile (Emerging Struggle pg. 165)(emphasis in the original quote as I found it, but probably not in the original book.)
Part of why I am where I am right now is because of the book of Proverbs; one of them says something like "look around; if you see a wise man, attach yourself to such a one. Wear out his doorstep," etc., which I took to mean to go and learn from those far wiser than myself. Hopefully, at least some of what has been thrown at this old wall has stuck, but I cannot and will not claim to have any wisdom of my own; just that with which Our Father has blessed me, as He blesses all who seek diligently, knock persistently, and ask repeatedly, IAW His Son's saying.
But because I am nowhere near as intelligent as you seem to think, I will gladly recommend people who are FAR more qualified than myself to serve in your cabinet!
With goodwill to all the People-
Hatman
Quote
My best to you and yours.
tenac
And may God's Blessings shower upon you and yours abundantly!
Warmest regards-
Hatman
Logged
“The ideal tyranny is that which is ignorantly self-administered by its victims. The most perfect slaves are, therefore, those which blissfully and unawaredly enslave themselves.”
~Dresden James
TENAC
Full Member
Faith: church of Christ
Posts: 228
Re: A New Alliance
«
Reply #13 on:
July 10, 2008, 03:01:01 PM »
Quote from: Hatman on July 08, 2008, 03:12:44 PM
Quote
Bravo! I always liked Ben. Whatever would we have named 40% of the roads and cities in this fair country were it not for him?
Quote
Macadam? Gravel? But yeah, Benjamin was an interesting character, and a great man, albeit not as moral as certain "christian" groups would have preferred, I'm sure. However, I think that the Divine Light of Inspiration shone in and around him on multiple occasions, probably a cause for their jealousy. In fact, FatherOblivion(from the "board that shall not be named) has the following as his signature line: "In wine, there is wisdom; in beer, there is freedom; in water, there is bacteria." ~Benjamin Franklin, he says, but probably falsely attributed; afaik, in the 1770's, no one called 'em bacteria, yet.
Yes, Ben was quite the.......interesting character. And the quote does sound alot like him.
Quote
Sometimes to move forward, one must move backwards first.
True, dat; iirc, the Constitutions of both Georgia and Vermont contain articles referring to "a frequent recurrence to fundamental principles," which is a VERY good thing. If you'd like, I'll attempt to find those particular quotes. Said that to say this; when lost, one cannot have a clear idea of where to go until one retraces their steps and gets their bearings---THEN, they may proceed with confidence and clarity.
Quote
I dont think we can, as a nation, go back as far as needed to change our current course.
Probably not, and here's one reason:
"Can the real Constitution be restored? Probably not. Too many Americans depend on government money under programs the Constitution doesn't authorize, and money talks with an eloquence Shakespeare could only envy. Ignorant people don't understand The Federalist Papers, but they understand government checks with their names on them."
-- Joseph Sobran(1946- ) Columnist
Quote
Were it not for the monetary system (unconstitutional Federal Reserve) there is no telling how much wealth this country could have accumulated over the past century. The monetary policy have had a great hand in maintaining the poverty classes as well as racism.
After several years of investigation and multiple books I've read, my conclusion is that approximately 90-95% of ALL the world's ills can be laid directly at the feet of those slaves to Mammon who pretend they are free because of their wealth(which allows them to enslave others), which will eat them like fire at the last day, according to James ch 5, iirc. As but two examples, cures for cancer and virtually all other diseases have been suppressed by them, as well as multiple energy-related inventions. Google 'Royal Rife' and read his story at the Rense.com article, and also google "3000 inventions suppressed", looking for the PESWiki article. So, yes, what is currently passing for "wealth" in this country is mostly valueless Federal Reserve Notes, empty PROMISES to pay dollars, but in and of themselves, naught but literal "monopoly money."
Quote
Quote
The quotes above a interesting if not telling. As I read through them, it was easy to see which were before the
Uh-oh! Something ate the rest of that sentence!(although I can speculate that the end went something like "before the Civil War"). I find it particularly interesting that there must have been quite a body of evidence regarding the plots, designs, and manipulations of the "moneyed classes" long before Madison wrote his apropos quote, which, IIRC, predates the Constitution itself!
Yes, you anticipated my final thoughts very close. Most all were before the imposition of the Fed Reserve.
Quote
I am not as strong on corporacracy as you seem to be.
I don't know what you mean here, although I will assume that this means "I am not as against the Corporatocracy as you are," which is ok. If you have the time or inclination, go(or buy) and read "Confessions of an Economic Hitman," or go and visit the
www.onedollardvdproject.com
, and order a few CD copies for yourself and friends you hope to awaken.
Quote
The Madison quote is telling however. But then, before the corporations, what did you have except private ownership?
The wealthy have long written the laws to favor themselves, and change them whenever the hoi polloi discover their loopholes and twists of the law; btw, did you know that the root word of "attorney" is "attorn," which means "to turn(over)" or to twist? This is why there's a subtle---but important---difference between attorney's and lawyers. But yes, a reading of "The Law," by Frederic Bastiat(see
http://www.barefootsworld.net/the_law.html
), would shortly reveal to your awakening mind that laws exist to protect life, liberty, and property, not the reverse. To perhaps whet your appetite for more, here are a few of his quotations:
"The war against illegal plunder has been fought since the beginning of the world. But how is... legal plunder to be identified? Quite simply. See if the law takes from some persons what belongs to them, and gives it to other persons to whom it does not belong. See if the law benefits one citizen at the expense of another by doing what the citizen himself cannot do without committing a crime. Then abolish this law without delay ... If such a law is not abolished immediately it will spread, multiply and develop into a system."
-- Frederic Bastiat(1801-1850) French economist, statesman, and author. He did most of his writing during the years just before -- and immediately following -- the French Revolution of February 1848
Source: "The Law" (1848)
"Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place."
-- Frederic Bastiat(1801-1850) French economist, statesman, and author.
Source: The Law, by Frederic Bastiat, 1850
"Men naturally rebel against the injustice of which they are victims. Thus, when plunder is organized by law for the profit of those who make the law, all the plundered classes try somehow to enter -- by peaceful or revolutionary means -- into the making of laws. According to their degree of enlightenment, these plundered classes may propose one of two entirely different purposes when they attempt to attain political power: Either they may wish to stop lawful plunder, or they may wish to share in it."
-- Frederic Bastiat(1801-1850) French economist, statesman, and author.
Source: "The Law" (1848)
"When law and morality contradict each other, the citizen has the cruel alternative of either losing his moral sense or losing his respect for the law."
-- Frederic Bastiat(1801-1850) French economist, statesman, and author.
"Everyone wants to live at the expense of the State; what they forget, though, is that the State lives at the expense of everyone."
-- Frederic Bastiat (1801-1850) French economist, statesman, and author.
"There is in all of us a strong disposition to believe that anything lawful is also legitimate. This belief is so widespread that many persons have erroneously held that things are 'just' because the law makes them so."
-- Frederic Bastiat (1801-1850) French economist, statesman, and author.
And to pick up on this last quote, please do your best to remember the following judicial rulings---ALWAYS:
"The jury has the right to judge both the law as well as the fact in controversy."
-- John Jay(1745-1829) first Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, First President of the United States - preceding George Washington, one of three men most responsible for the US Constitution
Source: Georgia v. Brailsford, 1794
"The jury, in all criminal cases, shall be the judges of the law and the facts."
-- Georgia Declaration of Rights, Art.I, Sec.II, Para. I
"NO one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it." 16th American Jurisprudence 2nd edition, Sec 177, late 2nd, Sec 256.
"All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void." - Marbury vs. Madison, 5 US (2 Cranch) 137, 174, 176, (1803). See also Miranda vs. Arizona, 384 US 436 p. 491 and Norton vs. Shelby County, 118 US 425 p. 442
"The pages of history shine on instances of the jury's exercise of its prerogative to disregard the instructions." - U.S. vs. Dougherty, 473 F 2d 1113, 1139 (1972), and see also State of Georgia vs. Brailford, et al 3 Dall, 1, and U.S. vs. Moynihan, 417 2d 1002, 1006 (1969)
Now, a couple more:
"Emergency does not create power. Emergency does not increase granted power or remove or diminish the restrictions imposed upon power granted or reserved. The Constitution was adopted in a period of grave emergency. Its grants of power to the federal government and its limitations of the power of the States were determined in the light of emergency, and they are not altered by emergency."